Dungeons: verschil tussen versies

Uit Ashes of Creation Wiki
Naar navigatie springen Naar zoeken springen
(Resize images)
(Add artwork and info)
Regel 1: Regel 1:
 
{{Stub}}
 
{{Stub}}
 +
[[File:vlcsnap-2017-10-17-11h45m49s163.png|thumb|400px|[[Alpha 0]] [[Dungeon|dungeon]] design by [[Javier Perez]].<ref name="livestream">[[2017-10-16_Livestream]]</ref>]]
 +
[[File:vlcsnap-2017-10-17-11h45m41s061.png|thumb|400px|[[Alpha 0]] [[Dungeon|dungeon]] design by [[Javier Perez]].<ref name="livestream"/>]]
 +
 +
== Dungeon scale ==
 +
 +
The intention is that dungeons are going to be "massive" in scale.<ref>[[File:dungeon scale.png|350px]]</ref>
 +
 +
* Massive caverns and spaces.
 +
* Places to suit larger and smaller commitments.
 +
** Where people with 30 minutes can participate.
  
 
== Open world ==
 
== Open world ==

Versie van 17 okt 2017 06:49

box warning orange.pngDit artikel is momenteel een stomp. Help ons door het uit te breiden.

Dungeon scale

The intention is that dungeons are going to be "massive" in scale.[2]

  • Massive caverns and spaces.
  • Places to suit larger and smaller commitments.
    • Where people with 30 minutes can participate.

Open world

There will be open world dungeons.[3]

  • The PvP flagging system presents a potential for open conflict.

Zergs

For every play, there should be a counterplay. We often see Castle Sieges turn into zerg-fests, which really doesn’t capture the epic, back-and-forth battles we wish to see in Ashes of Creation. One of our key pillars is that Choice Matters[4], and that applies to tactics and strategy as well. A well-formulated battle plan should win out over stat sheets and bodies. Zergs will generally be difficult to pull off, and will be eminently counterable through siege weapons, traps, and other battlefield tricks.[5]

Zergs are empowered by fast-travel. Meaningful travel times are intended to prevent zerg play from being so much of an influence.[6]

Encounters are designed to have meaning in terms of how boss skills and abilities relate to group compositions, tactics and strategies. Zerging is not experiencing content.[7] There are different ways to make a fight more difficult for larger sized groups without relying solely on stat buffs or making the boss a "damage sponge".[8]

  • Raid and dungeon bosses have specific mechanics and abilities that players need to learn and react to.[8] Zergs that are not aware of these mechanics or react to them appropriately will be wiped.[7]
  • There may be environmental hazards and AoE effects that cause more damage based on the number of players present.[8]
  • There is a give-and-take for guilds that want to see a larger number of members as opposed to a more focused group that may be a part of an alliance.[9]

We're very cognizant of the fact that we don't want to see zerging be a mechanic that's utilized by guilds to accomplish content or just to steamroll over sieges... There are specific mechanics that we are working on that will be seen through the testing phases that relate to a degree of understanding of certain systems that can't just be overrun with numbers.[9]Steven Sharif

Mechanics that encourage political intrigue will play a role in destabilizing zergs.[10]

The best way that I found in games I played previously to take down a zerg is to cause drama from within... It's that conflict inside of the politicking that happens in that big organization. If we provide opportunities for division to occur then it also provides stability to keep a server healthy away from that zerg mentality also... If we approach the castle siege and we've destroyed the walls and we're in the throne room and we're about to cast on the penultimate thing and I at this time am just so excited from what's happening that I'm like "screw it I'm gonna go for it". It's gonna be mine. I'm gonna take the taxes for the next month. I'm gonna take all the gear from the castle. I'm gonna take everything... We want that political intrigue to be present in the game.[10]Steven Sharif

Objective-based game play helps to balance the zerg mentality.[11]

I always feel that if you balance based on groups that in your balance focus is to incorporate features that play well from a player versus player perspective as well as a player versus environment perspective: Having support classes, having DPS and tanks that can obstruct movement and/or create bottlenecks on the field and stuff like that. I think a well-rounded raid it will perform better against a non well-rounded raid, however then you incorporate the second aspect of numbers; and that's where again mobility, organization, leadership tactics. Having objectives in gameplay that make those important helps to balance the zerg mentality that a lot of guilds can tend to have.[11]Steven Sharif

Instancing doesn't play a major role in limiting zergs, due to 80% of content in Ashes of Creation being open-world.[12]

  • There may be instanced locations within castle and node sieges where specific groups can participate in certain objective-based waypoints.[12]

Zerging is always a problem in a lot of these MMORPGs where you really can't control the number of participants in certain open-world systems; and in that sense instancing is a great tool that designers can sometimes use to curate a particular number of participants that you want. But the predominant amount of content within Ashes of Creation, over 80% of which is is open-world content, so instancing is very limited.[12]Steven Sharif

Zie ook

Referenties